The State Changers meeting focused on troubleshooting and refining the implementation of an authenticated submission ticket feature for a backend system. The key issue addressed involved ensuring only valid submissions (denoted by possessing either "over" or "under" keys) would go through, with all others halted at the back end as part of the precondition check.
The State Changers broke down the process involved in addressing this precondition, which involves examining each submission for validity inside a 'for each loop' construct. They established an 'is okay' variable that begins as true and switches to false whenever an invalid submission is detected. The strategy was meant to increase the security and efficiency of submitted data from the front end to the back end by eliminating bad payloads, thereby reducing unnecessary processes and potential error occurrences. Additionally, the conversation led to a discussion about error handling within workflows, particularly when fetching requests. As a future action item, the possibility of a sidebar meeting was suggested to go in depth on the error handling process within workflows. Lastly, the possible application of these mechanisms to WeWeb was hinted on. While the meeting was technical and task-specific, it did not directly mention or relate to any of the listed keywords such as "Xano", "FlutterFlow", "Zapier", "Make", "Integromat", "Outseta", "Retool", "Bubble", "Adalo", "AppGyver", "AppSheet", "Comnoco", "Fastgen", "Firebase", "Google", "OAuth", "Stripe", "Twilio", etc.
(Source: Office Hours 1/30 )
