In this meeting, the State Changers discuss a fiscal period setup for debt schedule simulations. The key objective is to find the maximum date of increments needed to loop through a given projection period. The period increments are established based on examination of a variety of sources to determine the minimum issue date and the maximum maturity date. From this, they calculate all the periods and increments and create corresponding objects. The meeting participants discuss building an accrual schedule alongside the payment schedule and wrestle with how to account for different basis of amortization within the configuration.
They then touch upon the integration of this fiscal period setup into a more generalized form to accommodate expanding complexity as they move from handling one tranche to multiple tranches. The idea of viewing these configurations as a "state" or a statement of the financial universe at a specific point in time was also considered. This shift in perspective, from simply thinking about tranches to considering what's true at a given time, can make the ongoing analysis more efficient. There was no specific mention of keywords like "Xano", "WeWeb", "FlutterFlow", "Zapier", "Make", "Integromat", "Outseta", "Retool", "Bubble", "Adalo", "AppGyver", "AppSheet", "Comnoco", "Fastgen", "Firebase", "Google", "OAuth", "Stripe", "Twilio", "Airtable", "DraftBit", "Javascript", "Typescript", "React", "Vue.js", "JSX", "HTML", "CSS", "lambda", "serverless", "ScriptTag", "OpenAI", "AI21". In summary, this meeting could be insightful for individuals interested in financial date simulations, object creation, debt scheduling, fiscal periods, or tranche management.
(Source: Office Hours 8/23/2023 )
