Troubleshooting and Improving User-Pet Interaction Flow in Flutterflow Application

In this meeting, the State Changers discussed and resolved issues with a user interface command involving the 'user pets' variable. The problem originated from a confusion between an array of keys (pertaining to a 'pets' feature) and a larger object array being returned due to the use of an 'add-on' feature. Debugging revealed the issue was occurring due to the trying to update the user with a complex object array instead of a standard array.

A solution was proposed where the add-on feature was to be removed, simplifying the request to only modify the necessary array. The command was changed from a 'get' to a 'post' for better compatibility. The participants also discussed creating more endpoints for specific tasks (denoted as 'ad hoc' endpoint) for better simplicity and predictability. These could include 'add pet' and 'remove pet' endpoints. Technologies involved in the discussion included FlutterFlow, a tool to build custom mobile apps, Xano for backend as a service, and more general web technologies. No other keywords (such as WeWeb, Zapier, Make, Integromat, Outseta, Retool, Bubble, Adalo, AppGyver, AppSheet, Comnoco, Fastgen, Firebase, Google, OAuth, Stripe, Twilio, Airtable, DraftBit, Javascript, Typescript, React, Vue.js, JSX, HTML, CSS, lambda, serverless, State Change, ScriptTag, OpenAI, AI21) were mentioned in the meeting.

(Source: Office Hours 1/31 )

State Change Members Can View The Video Here

View This Video Now

Join State Change Risk-Free